In a compelling address, Supreme Court Justice Surya Kant underscored a fundamental truth: while technology serves as a powerful partner in the legal world, the act of delivering justice remains an inherently human pursuit.
He articulated the core of legal practice, stating, “The essence of our calling lies not in cold data or complex algorithms, but in the warmth of conscience and the depth of compassion.” Justice Kant emphasized that a judge’s keen discernment, an advocate’s logical reasoning, a litigant’s inherent dignity, and the profound empathy that underpins every fair trial are the irreplaceable threads woven into the fabric of justice. These vital human qualities, he asserted, are beyond the grasp of any machine.
During his keynote at the National Law Conference, organized by the Bar Association of Sri Lanka on October 24, Justice Kant elaborated on the role of Artificial Intelligence (AI). He acknowledged that AI can be immensely helpful for tasks like researching legal precedents, drafting documents, or pinpointing inconsistencies. However, he drew a critical distinction: AI “cannot perceive the tremor in a witness’s voice, the anguish behind a petition, or the moral weight of a decision.”
“Let us be absolutely clear,” Justice Kant declared, “we are not seeking to replace the lawyer or the judge; rather, we are simply expanding their reach and sharpening their ability to serve.” He passionately advocated for a future where technology acts as a guiding force, but where human judgment and ethical leadership always remain at the helm.
Justice Kant, who is next in line to become India’s Chief Justice according to established seniority, reiterated that the legal profession cannot afford to overlook technological advancements, particularly in the realm of AI.
He concluded with a pivotal statement on the current juncture: “We find ourselves at a crucial moment – we can either resist technology and risk stagnation, or we can proactively shape and guide it, infusing our legal and ethical principles into its very design, ensuring that it enhances justice, rather than replacing it.”