Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan recently made it clear that the Tamil Nadu government must prioritize its students’ educational well-being over political considerations when it comes to accessing funds from the central government’s Samagra Shiksha program.
During a press conference held at IIT-Madras, Minister Pradhan stressed that the Tamil Nadu government is required to accept the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) proposed by the Union government to receive Samagra Shiksha funds. A key condition within this MoU is the implementation of the three-language formula, a point of contention given Tamil Nadu’s existing two-language policy.
“The MoU from the Government of India must be accepted,” he asserted. “The central government operates according to its established policies. There needs to be a mutual understanding. It’s simply not acceptable to place political priorities above the future of Tamil Nadu’s students. While I am committed to full cooperation, a certain level of discipline and mutual respect is essential in these matters.”
When questioned earlier about the Samagra Shiksha funds owed to Tamil Nadu, Mr. Pradhan characterized the situation as a “political issue,” referencing his previous statements both in Tamil Nadu and Parliament. He highlighted that the nation has embraced the National Education Policy (NEP), emphasizing the need for adherence to its guidelines.
Regarding Tamil Nadu’s steadfast two-language policy, Minister Pradhan reiterated his previous remarks, pointing out that some schools in the state are already teaching more than two languages. “That is your political stance,” he stated, “and the decision rests with you.”
The Minister firmly denied that the NEP intends to impose any language on any state. “The Government of India will not impose any language on any State,” Mr. Pradhan clarified. He suggested that the opposition to the policy was “a little bit politically motivated,” creating “a fear psychosis in society,” and stated that those making such claims should be accountable for their actions.
Pradhan confirmed that Tamil Nadu has received funds for various other initiatives, including mid-day meal schemes and adult literacy programs. Concerning funds under the Right to Education (RTE) Act, he mentioned that the court had issued specific observations and recommendations to the Union government.
He further recounted a meeting with Tamil Nadu’s School Education Minister Anbil Mahesh Poyyamozhi and MP Kanimozhi, during which he pledged cooperation on matters related to the RTE Act. When pressed about RTE Act funds, he emphasized his limited role in the matter, reiterating his respect for judicial decisions.
A Judge Raises a Point of Contention
Earlier that day, during a student interaction in the IIT-Madras auditorium, Justice G.R. Swaminathan of the Madras High Court rose from the front row to pose a question. He reminded the Minister of his directive in a Public Interest Litigation, instructing the Tamil Nadu government to launch an online portal for underprivileged students to secure admissions under the RTE Act.
The Judge then brought up the subsequent appeal to the Supreme Court and a contempt petition filed concerning the issue. “The Tamil Nadu government’s position is that Mr. Dharmendra Pradhan has withheld funds by linking the National Education Policy to this matter,” Justice Swaminathan stated, clearly frustrated. “Consequently, they claim they cannot comply with your directive. What exactly is going on here?”
Amidst some laughter from the audience, Minister Pradhan responded light-heartedly, “The contempt of court will certainly be a factor.” He acknowledged his awareness of the case, adding, “I will address that matter outside of this hall, to the media.”