Supreme Court Justice Surya Kant firmly stated that while technology is an invaluable asset to the legal profession, the fundamental act of delivering justice will forever remain a deeply human endeavor.
During his keynote address at the National Law Conference hosted by the Bar Association of Sri Lanka, Justice Kant eloquently articulated, “The very soul of our profession isn’t found in data points or complex algorithms, but in the bedrock of conscience and compassion. A judge’s keen discernment, an advocate’s logical reasoning, a litigant’s inherent dignity, and the profound empathy that breathes life into every fair trial—these are the vibrant threads of justice that no machine can ever truly replicate.”
On October 24, while discussing ‘Technology in the aid of the legal profession: A global perspective,’ Justice Kant acknowledged that Artificial Intelligence (AI) could assist with tasks like legal research, drafting documents, or pinpointing inconsistencies. However, he emphasized that AI “lacks the capacity to sense the subtle quiver in a witness’s voice, to grasp the deep anguish embedded in a petition, or to weigh the profound moral implications of a critical decision.”
“Let there be absolute clarity,” Justice Kant asserted, “we are not aiming to replace lawyers or judges. Instead, we are merely expanding their capabilities and enhancing their ability to serve justice more effectively. Technology should act as a guiding tool, but it is the human element that must ultimately govern.” He noted this while mentioning his position as a leading contender for the next Chief Justice of India, based on seniority. This discussion comes as the Union government has initiated the process to recommend a successor for the Chief Justice of India position.
Justice Kant also remarked that the legal sector simply cannot afford to disregard technological advancements, particularly in Artificial Intelligence.
“We find ourselves at a critical juncture,” Justice Kant concluded. “We have a choice: either resist technology and face stagnation, or actively shape and steer it, carefully embedding our legal and ethical principles into its very framework, ensuring it enhances justice rather than replacing it.”