The United States has taken the significant step of imposing sanctions on Colombia’s left-wing president, Gustavo Petro. The Treasury Department accused Petro of failing to adequately address the country’s escalating drug trafficking activities, stating that “President Petro has allowed drug cartels to flourish and refused to stop this activity.” This move also impacts Colombia’s Interior Minister Armando Benedetti, as well as Petro’s wife and eldest son, by restricting their access to any assets or properties they may hold within the United States.
Historically, Colombia has been a key partner for the US in its global fight against drugs, receiving substantial annual aid. However, relations have been strained, particularly since President Petro took office. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent highlighted that since Petro, a former guerrilla, assumed leadership, cocaine production has seen a dramatic increase, contributing to a significant drug supply into the United States. He emphasized that President Trump is taking decisive action and will not tolerate the flow of illicit drugs into the country.
The Treasury Department further noted that Colombia remains the world’s leading exporter of cocaine, a substance identified as a major drug threat to the United States. In parallel, the State Department announced it would not certify Colombia’s counter-narcotics efforts, a move that could affect future aid.
President Petro has publicly refuted these accusations, asserting on social media that he has actively combatted drug trafficking for decades and has contributed to reducing cocaine consumption in the US. He characterized the sanctions as a “complete paradox” but affirmed his commitment to continue the fight, stating, “not one step back, and never on our knees.”
The US military has recently intensified its operations in the southern Caribbean, targeting vessels suspected of carrying drugs. This action follows President Trump’s announcement last week regarding the suspension of payments and subsidies to Colombia. The sanctions imposed on a head of state are a rare but not unprecedented measure, with leaders from several other nations having faced similar actions.