The recent wave of international recognition for a Palestinian state, including endorsements from the UK, Canada, and Australia, marks a significant moment. Palestinian diplomat Husam Zomlot views this as a critical last chance to implement the two-state solution, emphasizing the global momentum behind Palestine’s cause.
However, the path forward is fraught with complications. The very definition of ‘Palestine’ as a state is debated, especially concerning its territorial boundaries. The Montevideo Convention’s criteria for statehood—a permanent population, a defined territory, a government, and the capacity for international relations—present challenges. While Palestinians have a population and can engage in international relations (as evidenced by Dr. Zomlot), the ‘defined territory’ aspect is blurred by Israeli settlements and the geographical separation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip. Furthermore, the ongoing conflict in Gaza has devastated much of the territory, raising serious concerns about the existing population’s safety and stability.
The critical requirement of a ‘functioning government’ is where Palestine faces its most significant hurdle. Decades of political division, particularly the split between Hamas in Gaza and the Palestinian Authority (PA) in the West Bank since 2007, have led to a fractured leadership. The PA, led by President Mahmoud Abbas, faces criticism for its perceived ineffectiveness and lack of recent elections, leaving many Palestinians disillusioned and calling for new leadership.
The article highlights Marwan Barghouti, currently imprisoned by Israel, as a potential unifying figure, despite his long incarceration. Opinion polls suggest he is a more popular choice for president than Abbas. However, his release remains uncertain, complicated by potential prisoner exchange negotiations and Israel’s stance.
The article also touches upon Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s firm opposition to Palestinian statehood, viewing it as a threat to Israel’s existence. His administration’s continued expansion of settlements, particularly projects aimed at isolating East Jerusalem from the West Bank, further undermines the prospects of a viable Palestinian state. Experts note that even strong leadership would struggle under such constrained conditions.
The international community is now faced with the challenge of moving beyond symbolic recognition towards tangible steps for peace. While Hamas has indicated a willingness to cede authority in Gaza to a technocratic administration, the broader issues of Palestinian unity, effective governance, and reconciliation remain paramount. The ultimate success of international recognition hinges on its ability to catalyze meaningful progress, rather than simply serve as a diplomatic gesture.
Related Articles
- Bowen: Netanyahu is presiding over a divided Israel – the fault lines are now chasms
- This ‘tough guy’ president says he’s tackling corruption. Rivals say he’s silencing opposition
- ‘Thank you, but it’s too late’: Why some Palestinians aren’t convinced by Starmer’s promise
More from the BBC
- In full: Statement announcing UK’s recognition of Palestinian state
- Starmer announces UK recognition of Palestinian state
- What does recognising a Palestinian state mean?
- Two shot dead in attack near West Bank-Jordan crossing, Israeli military says
- Israeli minister touts Gaza ‘real estate bonanza’, defying international backlash