Harvard University’s conservative student magazine, The Harvard Salient, is currently embroiled in a deep internal conflict. This follows editor-in-chief Richard Y. Rodgers’ outright defiance of a board order to suspend the publication’s operations pending a conduct investigation.
In a Tuesday email to the magazine’s mailing list, Rodgers vehemently rejected the board’s decision, labeling it an ‘unauthorised usurpation of power by a small number of individuals acting outside the bounds of their authority.’ He firmly stated that The Salient ‘continues to operate under its legitimate editorial leadership until further notice.’
This message served as a sharp rebuke to the magazine’s 10-member board of directors. The board had announced its decision on Sunday to temporarily halt operations after the publication of material it considered ‘reprehensible, abusive, and demeaning.’ The board also cited ‘credible complaints about the broader culture’ within the organization, as reported by The Harvard Crimson.
A Battle Over Authority and Accountability
Rodgers maintains that the suspension directly violates the magazine’s governing rules. He pointed out that the board failed to provide adequate notice or adhere to proper procedures for convening a meeting. Furthermore, he argued that the move breached The Salient’s bylaws, which, according to Harvard’s student organization directory, do not explicitly mention the board of directors.
In his email, Rodgers urged members to disregard any future communications from the board, declaring them ‘illegitimate.’ He later informed The Harvard Crimson that a majority of active members had ‘withdrawn from official channels of communication’ to protest the board’s actions, highlighting the growing rift between the publication’s editorial team and its oversight body. Rodgers further suggested that the board members should resign to allow the organization to ‘rebuild in good faith.’
Board Stands Firm Amidst the Dispute
Naomi Schaefer Riley, a conservative commentator and board member, countered Rodgers’ claims. She informed The Crimson that the board acts as The Salient’s legitimate governing authority and was well within its rights to pause the magazine’s operations. Riley affirmed that the board is ‘investigating recent events as quickly and as responsibly as possible.’
The current board of The Salient includes notable alumni such as chair Alexander Acosta, treasurer Christopher Krug, and former presidents Sarah L. Steele and Jacob A. Cremers. Additionally, four Harvard faculty members, including government professors Eric M. Nelson and Harvey C. Mansfield, serve as ex officio members. The magazine’s president, Julia G. Grinstead, who shares administrative authority with Rodgers under The Salient’s bylaws, has yet to comment publicly on the ongoing dispute.
Controversial Material Sparked the Outcry
This escalating dispute stems from weeks of criticism surrounding The Salient’s September edition. This issue notably featured language that strikingly resembled a 1939 speech by Adolf Hitler. At the time, Rodgers defended the piece, asserting that neither the author nor the editors intended to quote Hitler.
The same edition also contained an article that referred to the political left as ‘our enemies,’ published shortly after the passing of conservative activist Charlie Kirk. According to The Harvard Crimson, the board’s Sunday statement did not explicitly name which specific articles or complaints triggered the suspension order.
Established in 1981, The Harvard Salient has historically served as a platform for conservative and dissenting voices on campus. Relaunched in 2021, the magazine has recently faced heightened scrutiny regarding its tone and editorial choices. This situation reflects a broader, ongoing tension surrounding free expression and ideological boundaries within university environments.
An Unclear Path Forward
The power struggle between the magazine’s leadership and its board brings to light a more fundamental question about the governance of student-led publications at prestigious institutions: who ultimately determines where free speech ends and misconduct begins?
While the board continues its investigation, Rodgers’ defiant stance suggests that The Harvard Salient may, at least in name, continue its publishing efforts, even as critical questions of authority and accountability remain unresolved.