The US government has entered a shutdown, a consequence of the Senate’s inability to pass a crucial spending bill. This marks the first federal shutdown in nearly seven years, leading to significant curtailments in government operations.
Historically, these shutdowns eventually conclude as political pressure and public dissatisfaction mount, compelling one side to yield. This analysis outlines four possible scenarios for how the current shutdown might be brought to an end:
Democrats quickly break ranks
The recent vote saw some Democrats joining Republicans in opposing a bill that would have kept the government funded. While a majority of Democrats voted against it, the fact that a few from their own party, particularly those facing re-election in swing states, voted in favour suggests a potential for internal division. These vulnerable Democrats may prioritize economic stability and public opinion over party solidarity, potentially leading to a compromise to end the shutdown.
Democrats back down
As the shutdown persists, the pressure on Democrats to concede will likely intensify. Government employees, a key Democratic constituency, will feel the immediate financial strain, potentially leading to widespread discontent. The public often blames the party initiating the shutdown. If this trend holds, Democrats might opt to end the shutdown, having made their point, even without achieving all their objectives. This could still allow them to highlight issues like expiring healthcare subsidies and cuts to social programs, potentially benefiting them in future elections.
Republicans make concessions
Currently, Republicans appear to hold a stronger negotiating position. However, they might miscalculate the public’s reaction and end up conceding. Historically, Republicans have often been associated with initiating shutdowns. If they overplay their hand in pursuing budget cuts, they could face public backlash. A scenario where Republicans offer assurances on extending health insurance subsidies could be a strategic move to gain political advantage and avoid Democratic attacks in upcoming elections. While they might publicly decry negotiating with ‘hostage-takers,’ underlying common ground on certain issues could facilitate a compromise.
The shutdown stretches on (and both sides lose)
The current political climate is marked by intense rhetoric and partisan animosity. If the shutdown continues for an extended period, similar to the record-breaking 35-day shutdown previously experienced, the consequences could be severe. This could lead to widespread disruption and economic impact, regardless of which party is perceived to have ‘won.’ In such a scenario, both parties could suffer electoral repercussions, leading to increased public dissatisfaction and paving the way for new political forces promising radical change.
Related Articles:
- White House says layoffs ‘imminent’ with no end to shutdown in sight
- Why the US government has shut down and what happens now
- US government shuts down with path to reopening uncertain
More from the BBC:
- Watch: Two Delta passenger planes collide at LaGuardia Airport
- ‘My pay is being held hostage’: Federal workers on US government shutdown
- How much time could Diddy spend in prison?
- Could US government ban apps which track ICE agents?
- ‘None of us have ever asked for special treatment’: US female veterans respond to Hegseth speech