CHENNAI: The proposed Tamil Nadu Private Universities (Amendment) Bill 2025, which recently passed the Legislative Assembly, is now facing an extensive review. This decision comes after a wave of protests from various political parties, notably the opposition AIADMK and the ruling DMK’s ally, the CPI, along with significant public concern and strong opposition from the influential Association of University Teachers (AUT).
The initial intent of the Bill, introduced on October 15 and passed on October 17, was to simplify the process for establishing new private universities. Key provisions included allowing existing colleges to transition into “Brownfield” universities and creating a new category for minority private universities under Article 30 of the Constitution. It also aimed to reduce the minimum land area requirements, a move intended to ease the challenge of finding large, continuous land parcels in rapidly urbanizing Tamil Nadu where land values are consistently rising.
However, critics, including the AUT, argued that the Bill in its current form could lead to the “corporatisation” of higher education. They expressed deep apprehension that it might adversely impact marginalized students by limiting their access to affordable higher education. Concerns were also raised about the potential conversion of existing private colleges, including government-aided institutions, into private universities without adequate oversight.
Responding to this mounting opposition, Education Minister Govi Chezhiaan issued a statement clarifying the government’s position. He emphasized that while the Bill sought to streamline procedures and create opportunities for educational institutions to upgrade, it was always intended to incorporate robust legal safeguards for the welfare of all stakeholders.
Minister Chezhiaan highlighted that Tamil Nadu already boasts the highest percentage of students enrolled in higher education across India, underscoring the ongoing need for more institutions. He acknowledged that the existing stringent land requirements posed a significant hurdle, which the amendment sought to address by aligning with laws in other states to facilitate new university establishments.
Crucially, regarding the fears surrounding the reservation policy, the Minister firmly stated that the Dravidian model government would never compromise on social justice. He affirmed that reservation policies would be strictly adhered to in student admissions, teacher appointments, tuition fee structures, and the overall protection of employee welfare. He also noted that the government has not yet granted permission to “de facto” universities that do not respect state reservation rights.
Ultimately, acting on the advice of Chief Minister M K Stalin, the draft legislation will be submitted for a comprehensive review. This process will involve gathering opinions from educationists, legal experts, and relevant officials to ensure all concerns are thoroughly addressed before the Bill is finalized.